Security builder & leader

Cloud Security Attestation Beyond SAS 70

SAS 70 was designed for financial systems, not security certification—it only confirms controls the provider paid auditors to evaluate. Better options include SysTrust (prescriptive control set), ISO 27001 certification, AT section 101 attestation, or the BITS Shared Assessments SIG Questionnaire for specific control questions.

As companies consider adopting cloud computing services, they often seek to understand the cloud provider’s internal IT and security controls. This is particularly relevant when the applicable systems or applications handle sensitive data or are subject to contractual, regulatory or other compliance commitments. Unfortunately, companies often place too much trust into the mere existence of the cloud provider’s SAS 70 report. Gartner released a report titled SAS 70 Is Not Proof of Security, Continuity or Privacy Compliance.

According to its summary,

“The SAS 70 auditing report is widely misused by service providers that find it convenient to mischaracterize the program as being a form of security certification. Gartner considers this to be a deceptive and harmful practice.”

The major finding of the report, as described by Chris Schellman of SAS 70 Solutions Inc, is that “the SAS 70 audit is not a security or compliance audit and does not result in a certification.”

Why is that? Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) number 70 was established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) to describe how Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) should conduct audits. Its intended use was to review financial systems, for instance in the context of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) reporting. As Gartner’s French Caldwell put it, “SAS 70 is not a security, continuity or privacy compliance standard.” Gartner’sJayHeiser further clarifies,

“The only thing that can conclusively be said about having a SAS 70 Type II attestation is that an auditing firm has agreed that the service provider is effectively performing those controls that they paid the auditing firm to evaluate.”

This implies that the mere existence of a SAS 70 Type II attestation is useful, but not sufficient to provide an assurance of the cloud provider’s security controls relevant to a particular customer. The provider’s customer needs to understand what controls were included in the audit’s scope, and should confirm that these controls match the customer’s needs.

Unfortunately, AICPA’s guidelines state that the provider’s SAS 70 report can only be shared with existing customers, according to a blog posting by Justin Alexander. This makes its contents unavailable to prospective customers. What options besides—or, rather, in addition to—SAS 70 might be useful to prospective cloud customers?

Cloud security attestation is an area that will probably see much discussion as more companies consider adopting cloud computing.

About the Author

Lenny Zeltser is a cybersecurity executive with deep technical roots, product management experience, and a business mindset. As CISO at Axonius, he leads the security and IT program, focusing on trust and growth. He is also a Faculty Fellow at SANS Institute and the creator of REMnux, a popular Linux toolkit for malware analysis. Lenny shares his perspectives on security leadership and technology at zeltser.com.

Learn more →